Senate Bill amendment could overturn rebirth of Damascus

From the article:

According to state law, a vote to disincorporate requires a majority of all registered voters within the city limits show up to the polls. The court ruled the measure should have been nullified because voter turnout was less than half of registered voters.

James De Young, who is now serving as mayor of Damascus, led the effort in court to resurrect the city. That process took three years. If the amendment to SB 226 successfully makes it all the way to Governor Kate Brown’s desk, Damascus officials expect another long court battle.

Both De Young and Carson drove to Salem to testify against the amendment.

“We have not seen this kind of intentional and systematic destruction of a city in Oregon since the halcyon days of the Rajneesh,” wrote Carson in a letter to the Oregon Senate and House of Representatives.

2 thoughts on “Gresham Outlook coverage of SB 226

  1. Does anyone have a copy of the amendment that addresses the situation of Damascus? I have read through the posted SB, but it is either not there or written in such legislative mumbo jumbo as to be indecipherable.

    Like

    1. Jeanne, we are working on getting that on the website for you. Given the “gut and stuff” the listed bill as you point out is not the correct one. We have a PDF which we are seeking to avoid any download items from this site. When we get an updated link for the PDF we will get it up on the site for you. Sorry for the inconvenience.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s